With Day 2 of the public hearings on impeachment in the books, Grassfire wants to know what you think of the House Intelligence Committee's Democrat-led effort to remove President Trump from office. So far, the three witnesses called have presented no direct evidence implicating America's Commander-in-Chief of a "quid pro quo," "bribery," "extortion" or any other "high crimes and misdemeanors" constitutionally required to impeach a duly elected president of the United States.
Committee chairman Adam Schiff (D-CA), the chief architect of the second "Witch Hunt" against the President, has relied on hearsay and second-hand, third-hand and even fourth-hand information to make his case. After Day 1 of the hearings on Wednesday, the committee's ranking member, Devin Nunes (R-CA), called the impeachment-inquiry Witch Hunt a "sham" and a "low-rent Ukrainian sequel" to the "Russia hoax."
Thanks, in advance, for voting in Grassfire's "Schiff Sham?" QuickPoll.
For liberty and limited government,
The Grassfire Team
P.S. Our QuickPolls are not scientific, nor do they endorse a specific candidate or Grassfire position. They are for informational purposes only.